I can't even get into the constant stream of (at best) half-truths coming out of the McCain campaign, which is a real disappointment to me as someone who at least used to respect McCain. (Richard Cohen, a former McCain cheerleader, outlines his disappointment in a great column in the Washington Post.) But I had to point this out -- one of those moments where you realize that McCain's biggest argument is sometimes with himself. Here's how he's talked about regulation in the economy over the past two days:

- Deregulation: McCain issued a statement Monday morning saying that “we cannot tolerate a system that handicaps our markets and our banks.”

- Regulation: McCain’s campaign then put out an ad calling for “tougher rules on Wall Street.”

- Deregulation: This morning, on NBC’s Today Show, McCain said, “Of course, I don’t like excessive and unnecessary government regulation.”

- Regulation: Then, on CBS’s The Early Show, McCain said, “Do I believe in excess government regulation? Yes.”

- Both: On CNBC’s Squawk Box, McCain said, “We don’t want to burden average citizens with over-regulation and government bureaucracy…And I’m proud to be a Teddy Roosevelt Republican, who said, ‘unfettered capitalism leads to corruption,’ and we’ve got to fix this.”

Full story at thinkprogress.org.

Posted
AuthorMark McClusky
CategoriesPolitics

So, for the folks who are saying things like this, from the Washington Post:

"I hate Obama so much that I'm going to devote as much time to McCain as I did to Hillary," said Adita Blanco, a Democrat from Edward, Okla., who has never voted for a Republican. "Obama has nothing. He has no experience. The Democratic Party doesn't care about us. You couldn't treat [Clinton] any worse."

Adita Blanco, I respectfully submit that you're an idiot. You supported Clinton, and you're a Democrat, but you're going to work for McCain, who opposes abortion rights, supports increasing our oil drilling, and thinks the economy is fundamentally sound?

Really?

See, this sort of short-sighted worldview is why we lost two elections to George Bush. You don't see the Republicans involved in this sort of intra-party battle, because they're smart enough or disciplined enough to realize that a member of their party is likely a better choice for them, even if they supported someone else in the primary. I don't hear Mike Huckabee's voters acting like they're owed something for coming in second.

I thought Hillary's speech last night was terrific, and I have a lot of admiration for her. But she lost. You want to be mad at someone? Be mad at her, and the campaign she ran. This was her nomination to lose, and she lost it.

I know, I know, this is easy for me to say as 1) a man, and 2) an Obama supporter. But I have this uneasy feeling that we're about to enter the same looking glass world we were in in 2000, when a bunch of potential Democratic voters looked at Bush and Gore, decided that there wasn't much of a difference between them, and then voted for Ralph Freakin' Nader.

Think that mattered? I do. So let's not make the same mistake out of some sense of grievance. Please.

Posted
AuthorMark McClusky
CategoriesPolitics